The State of Maharashtra vs Naganath Basappa Kyama — 1117/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150020822024
Filing Number
1746/2024
Filing Date
11-12-2024
Registration No
1117/2024
Registration Date
11-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
Excise
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Naganath Basappa Kyama
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 29-10-2025 | Appearance |
| 31-07-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the case under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. against accused Naganath Basappa Kyama for an alleged Maharashtra Prohibition Act violation, finding that continued proceedings would constitute abuse of process. The dismissal was warranted because the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over more than a year, and police destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), making trial impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the case under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. against accused Naganath Basappa Kyama for an alleged Maharashtra Prohibition Act violation, finding that continued proceedings would constitute abuse of process. The dismissal was warranted because the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over more than a year, and police destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), making trial impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts