Somshankar Shivputrappa Golle vs Sangita Gurappa Pedsangi Advocate - Marathe Umesh Balkrishana — 138/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1,2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO150019322024

e-Filing Number

24-10-2024

Filing Number

318/2024

Filing Date

25-Oct-2024

Registration No

138/2024

Registration Date

25-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Somshankar Shivputrappa Golle

    Adv. Gajul Satish Sudarshan

  2. 2.Ravindra Shivputrappa Golle

    Adv. KONAPURE REVANSIDDHA CHANBASAPPA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sangita Gurappa Pedsangi Advocate - Marathe Umesh Balkrishana

  2. 2.Ulhas Mallikarjun Patil

  3. 3.Swami Samarth Annachatra Mandal, Trust Akkalkot, Founder President, Janmejay Vijaysingh Raje Bhosale

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  7. 10-Oct-2025

    List of Witness

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  8. 21-Aug-2025

    List of Witness

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  9. 25-Jul-2025

    List of Witness

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    List of Witness

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  11. 19-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  12. 17-Apr-2025

    Order

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  13. 15-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 138/2024 The court allowed Defendant No. 3's application to file a written statement beyond the prescribed time limit. The Civil Judge found that the delay was not inordinate and that the suit should be decided on merits rather than technical grounds, prioritizing the rights of parties. The written statement filed on record is now admitted as part of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 15-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  15. 25-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  16. 18-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  17. 06-Feb-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  18. 06-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  19. 11-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  20. 26-Nov-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  21. 05-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 25-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 138/2024 The court allowed Defendant No. 3's application to file a written statement beyond the prescribed time limit. The Civil Judge found that the delay was not inordinate and that the suit should be decided on merits rather than technical grounds, prioritizing the rights of parties. The written statement filed on record is now admitted as part of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case