The State of Maharashtra vs Gurushant Basavanappa Tolnur — 1004/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 05th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150018522024
Filing Number
1553/2024
Filing Date
22-10-2024
Registration No
1004/2024
Registration Date
22-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
485
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Gurushant Basavanappa Tolnur
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 27-02-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 29-12-2025 | B.W._Unready |
| 23-09-2025 | B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gurushant Basavanappa Tolnur (1004/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against the accused for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing abuse of process. Despite multiple summons issued since the charge sheet was filed on 19.10.2024, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence for over a year. The court found no justification for keeping the case pending and noted that police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), rendering further proceedings futile. The case was disposed of under Section 258 of Cr.P.C., and the accused's P.R. bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gurushant Basavanappa Tolnur (1004/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against the accused for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing abuse of process. Despite multiple summons issued since the charge sheet was filed on 19.10.2024, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence for over a year. The court found no justification for keeping the case pending and noted that police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), rendering further proceedings futile. The case was disposed of under Section 258 of Cr.P.C., and the accused's P.R. bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts