The State of Maharashtra vs Gurushant Basavanappa Tolnur — 1004/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 05th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150018522024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1553/2024

Filing Date

22-10-2024

Registration No

1004/2024

Registration Date

22-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

485

Police Station

South Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Gurushant Basavanappa Tolnur

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

05-05-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

B.W._Unready

27-02-2026

B.W._Unready

29-12-2025

B.W._Unready

23-09-2025

B.W._Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gurushant Basavanappa Tolnur (1004/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against the accused for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing abuse of process. Despite multiple summons issued since the charge sheet was filed on 19.10.2024, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence for over a year. The court found no justification for keeping the case pending and noted that police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), rendering further proceedings futile. The case was disposed of under Section 258 of Cr.P.C., and the accused's P.R. bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gurushant Basavanappa Tolnur (1004/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against the accused for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing abuse of process. Despite multiple summons issued since the charge sheet was filed on 19.10.2024, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence for over a year. The court found no justification for keeping the case pending and noted that police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), rendering further proceedings futile. The case was disposed of under Section 258 of Cr.P.C., and the accused's P.R. bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case