The State of Maharashtra vs Malappa Basavraj Pujari — 1002/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150018502024
Filing Number
1551/2024
Filing Date
22-10-2024
Registration No
1002/2024
Registration Date
22-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
492
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Malappa Basavraj Pujari
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 28-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 07-10-2025 | Appearance |
| 07-07-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Malappa Basavraj Pujari (1002/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case filed against Malappa Pujari for alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. Despite multiple summons issued over more than one year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence in court, and the court found continued pendency would constitute abuse of process. The court invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code to stop proceedings and disposed of the case, cancelling the accused's P.R. bonds and ordering disposal of seized liquor bottles after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Malappa Basavraj Pujari (1002/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case filed against Malappa Pujari for alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. Despite multiple summons issued over more than one year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence in court, and the court found continued pendency would constitute abuse of process. The court invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code to stop proceedings and disposed of the case, cancelling the accused's P.R. bonds and ordering disposal of seized liquor bottles after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts