The State of Maharashtra vs Malappa Basavraj Pujari — 1002/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150018502024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1551/2024

Filing Date

22-10-2024

Registration No

1002/2024

Registration Date

22-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

492

Police Station

South Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Malappa Basavraj Pujari

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

08-05-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Order on Exh

28-01-2026

Order on Exh

07-10-2025

Appearance

07-07-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Malappa Basavraj Pujari (1002/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case filed against Malappa Pujari for alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. Despite multiple summons issued over more than one year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence in court, and the court found continued pendency would constitute abuse of process. The court invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code to stop proceedings and disposed of the case, cancelling the accused's P.R. bonds and ordering disposal of seized liquor bottles after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Malappa Basavraj Pujari (1002/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case filed against Malappa Pujari for alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. Despite multiple summons issued over more than one year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence in court, and the court found continued pendency would constitute abuse of process. The court invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code to stop proceedings and disposed of the case, cancelling the accused's P.R. bonds and ordering disposal of seized liquor bottles after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case