The State of Maharashtra vs Shardabai Amabao Khetri — 1001/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150018492024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1550/2024

Filing Date

22-10-2024

Registration No

1001/2024

Registration Date

22-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

500

Police Station

South Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Shardabai Amabao Khetri

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

08-05-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Order on Exh

28-01-2026

Order on Exh

07-10-2025

Appearance

07-07-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of State v. Sharadabai Khetri (Case 1001/2024) The Akkalkot South Police Station charged Sharadabai Khetri under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for possessing 10 liters of illicit liquor. The court dismissed the case under Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S.) because the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over more than one year, constituting an abuse of process. The court cancelled her P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of the seized liquor after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of State v. Sharadabai Khetri (Case 1001/2024) The Akkalkot South Police Station charged Sharadabai Khetri under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for possessing 10 liters of illicit liquor. The court dismissed the case under Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S.) because the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over more than one year, constituting an abuse of process. The court cancelled her P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of the seized liquor after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case