The State of Maharashtra vs Khajappa Parsappa Arenavaru Etc 10 Advocate - Gaudnavaru Mayappa Shivanna — 314/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,327,354(B),143,147,148,149,323,504,506. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150017632024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
1466/2024
Filing Date
10-10-2024
Registration No
314/2024
Registration Date
10-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
FIR Details
FIR Number
218
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Khajappa Parsappa Arenavaru Etc 10 Advocate - Gaudnavaru Mayappa Shivanna
Mukesh Basavant Arenavaru
Maulali Shivchalappa Arenavaru
Rahul Parsappa Arenavaru
Sandip Basavant Arenavaru
Dharma Shivachalappa Arenavaru
Parvati Parsappa Arenavaru
Sharnabai Shivchalappa Arenavaru
Kamalabai @ Vidya Raju Arenavaru
Laxmibai Parsappa Arenavru
Kasturabai Basavant Arenavru
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCC 314/2024 Accused No. 01 and 02 filed a discharge application under Section 262 BNSS, claiming false implication in charges including IPC Sections 324, 327, 354(B), 143, 147-149, 323, 504, and 506. The court rejected the discharge application, finding sufficient grounds in the chargesheet and victim statements to proceed against the accused, and determining the accused's absence from the incident spot could not be readily inferred without satisfactory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCC 314/2024 Accused No. 01 and 02 filed a discharge application under Section 262 BNSS, claiming false implication in charges including IPC Sections 324, 327, 354(B), 143, 147-149, 323, 504, and 506. The court rejected the discharge application, finding sufficient grounds in the chargesheet and victim statements to proceed against the accused, and determining the accused's absence from the incident spot could not be readily inferred without satisfactory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts