The State of Maharashtra vs Khajappa Parsappa Arenavaru Etc 10 Advocate - Gaudnavaru Mayappa Shivanna — 314/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,327,354(B),143,147,148,149,323,504,506. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150017632024

Filing Number

1466/2024

Filing Date

10-Oct-2024

Registration No

314/2024

Registration Date

10-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

218

Police Station

South Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,327,354(B),143,147,148,149,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Khajappa Parsappa Arenavaru Etc 10 Advocate - Gaudnavaru Mayappa Shivanna

  2. 2.Mukesh Basavant Arenavaru

  3. 3.Maulali Shivchalappa Arenavaru

  4. 4.Rahul Parsappa Arenavaru

  5. 5.Sandip Basavant Arenavaru

  6. 6.Dharma Shivachalappa Arenavaru

  7. 7.Parvati Parsappa Arenavaru

  8. 8.Sharnabai Shivchalappa Arenavaru

  9. 9.Kamalabai @ Vidya Raju Arenavaru

  10. 10.Laxmibai Parsappa Arenavru

  11. 11.Kasturabai Basavant Arenavru

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Arguments

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  13. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  14. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  15. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  16. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  17. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  18. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  19. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  20. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  21. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  22. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  23. 19-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCC 314/2024 Accused No. 01 and 02 filed a discharge application under Section 262 BNSS, claiming false implication in charges including IPC Sections 324, 327, 354(B), 143, 147-149, 323, 504, and 506. The court rejected the discharge application, finding sufficient grounds in the chargesheet and victim statements to proceed against the accused, and determining the accused's absence from the incident spot could not be readily inferred without satisfactory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  25. 14-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  26. 24-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  27. 10-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  28. 03-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  29. 15-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  30. 13-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  31. 13-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 10-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCC 314/2024 Accused No. 01 and 02 filed a discharge application under Section 262 BNSS, claiming false implication in charges including IPC Sections 324, 327, 354(B), 143, 147-149, 323, 504, and 506. The court rejected the discharge application, finding sufficient grounds in the chargesheet and victim statements to proceed against the accused, and determining the accused's absence from the incident spot could not be readily inferred without satisfactory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case