The State of Maharashtra vs Siddhanna Hanmant Birajdar — 814/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150015402024
Filing Number
1258/2024
Filing Date
06-09-2024
Registration No
814/2024
Registration Date
06-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
273
Police Station
North Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Siddhanna Hanmant Birajdar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 21-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-10-2025 | Appearance |
| 09-07-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the prosecution case against Siddhanna Birajdar under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (illicit liquor) by invoking Section 258 of CrPC, citing the accused's persistent absence despite repeated summons over more than one year and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence. The court found that continuing the proceedings would constitute an abuse of process. The accused's PR bonds were cancelled and the 11-liter seized illicit liquor was ordered disposed of per law after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the prosecution case against Siddhanna Birajdar under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (illicit liquor) by invoking Section 258 of CrPC, citing the accused's persistent absence despite repeated summons over more than one year and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence. The court found that continuing the proceedings would constitute an abuse of process. The accused's PR bonds were cancelled and the 11-liter seized illicit liquor was ordered disposed of per law after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts