Bhimashankar Dharmrao Birajdar vs Nanasaheb Dharmrao Birajdar Advocate - Hardikar Vijay Ashok — 67/2023

Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 67/2023 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" order and condone the 10-month delay in filing their written statement in a perpetual injunction suit. The defendants claimed ill health prevented timely filing; the plaintiff argued intentional avoidance. The court granted the application subject to defendants paying Rs. 500 as costs, finding that rejecting it would cause irreparable harm to defendants while allowing it caused only minor delay to the plaintiff. The defendants' written statement will be read and recorded after cost payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.