Bhimashankar Dharmrao Birajdar vs Nanasaheb Dharmrao Birajdar Advocate - Hardikar Vijay Ashok — 67/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO150014422023
Filing Number
212/2023
Filing Date
14-Jul-2023
Registration No
67/2023
Registration Date
14-Jul-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhimashankar Dharmrao Birajdar
Adv. Kulkarni Mukund Madhavrao
-
2.Santosh Bhimashankar Birajdar
Adv. Kulkarni Mukund Madhavrao
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nanasaheb Dharmrao Birajdar Advocate - Hardikar Vijay Ashok
-
2.Jayashree Nanasaheb Birajdar
-
3.Subhash Nanasaheb Birajdar
-
4.Sudhir Nanasaheb Birajdar
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-May-2026
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
18-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
27-Nov-2024
List of Witness
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
06-Nov-2024
Issues
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
14-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
28-Aug-2024
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
31-Jul-2024
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
10-Jul-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 67/2023 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" order and condone the 10-month delay in filing their written statement in a perpetual injunction suit. The defendants claimed ill health prevented timely filing; the plaintiff argued intentional avoidance. The court granted the application subject to defendants paying Rs. 500 as costs, finding that rejecting it would cause irreparable harm to defendants while allowing it caused only minor delay to the plaintiff. The defendants' written statement will be read and recorded after cost payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jul-2024
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
05-Jul-2024
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
19-Jun-2024
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
10-Apr-2024
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
27-Feb-2024
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
24-Jan-2024
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
20-Dec-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
29-Nov-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
11-Oct-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
20-Sep-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
23-Aug-2023
Notice_Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
02-Aug-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
17-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2023
Case Summary - R.C.S. No. 67/2023 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "no written statement" order and condone the 10-month delay in filing their written statement in a perpetual injunction suit. The defendants claimed ill health prevented timely filing; the plaintiff argued intentional avoidance. The court granted the application subject to defendants paying Rs. 500 as costs, finding that rejecting it would cause irreparable harm to defendants while allowing it caused only minor delay to the plaintiff. The defendants' written statement will be read and recorded after cost payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts