The State of Maharashtra vs Nagnath Ankush More — 727/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150013982024

Filing Number

1137/2024

Filing Date

29-Aug-2024

Registration No

727/2024

Registration Date

29-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

284

Police Station

North Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagnath Ankush More

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the case against Nagnath Ankush More for illicit liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of CrPC after the accused repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple summons over more than one year. The court found no merit in further delaying the proceedings and ordered cancellation of the accused's recognizance bonds and disposal of seized evidence after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  5. 30-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  6. 02-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  7. 28-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  8. 03-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  9. 04-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 727/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case against Nagnath Ankush More for illicit liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of CrPC after the accused repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple summons over more than one year. The court found no merit in further delaying the proceedings and ordered cancellation of the accused's recognizance bonds and disposal of seized evidence after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case