The State of Maharashtra vs Malamma Laxman Bansode — 659/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150012432024
Filing Number
1002/2024
Filing Date
02-08-2024
Registration No
659/2024
Registration Date
02-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
87
Police Station
North Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Malamma Laxman Bansode
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 20-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 11-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 19-07-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Malamma Laxman Bansode (659/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against the accused for alleged offence under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of Cr.P.C. (Section 281 of B.N.S.S.). Despite multiple summons, the accused remained absent throughout the proceedings, and the prosecution failed to secure his presence for over one year, constituting abuse of process. The court cancelled the accused's P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of seized illicit liquor (13 liters) and plastic can according to law after expiry of the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Malamma Laxman Bansode (659/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against the accused for alleged offence under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of Cr.P.C. (Section 281 of B.N.S.S.). Despite multiple summons, the accused remained absent throughout the proceedings, and the prosecution failed to secure his presence for over one year, constituting abuse of process. The court cancelled the accused's P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of seized illicit liquor (13 liters) and plastic can according to law after expiry of the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts