The State of Maharashtra vs Arjun Dhondappa Helave — 657/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150012412024
Filing Number
1000/2024
Filing Date
02-08-2024
Registration No
657/2024
Registration Date
02-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Arjun Dhondappa Helave
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 20-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 11-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 19-07-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Arjun Dhondappa Helave (657/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against Arjun Helave for alleged illicit liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of Cr.P.C. The court found that despite multiple summons issued since the July 2023 charge sheet, the accused remained absent and the prosecution failed to secure his presence for over a year, constituting an abuse of process. The court cancelled his P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of seized liquor (10 liters) and container per law after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Arjun Dhondappa Helave (657/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against Arjun Helave for alleged illicit liquor possession under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of Cr.P.C. The court found that despite multiple summons issued since the July 2023 charge sheet, the accused remained absent and the prosecution failed to secure his presence for over a year, constituting an abuse of process. The court cancelled his P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of seized liquor (10 liters) and container per law after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts