The State of Maharashtra vs Chandu Saidappa Talawar — 652/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150012362024

Case disposed

Filing Number

995/2024

Filing Date

02-08-2024

Registration No

652/2024

Registration Date

02-08-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

293

Police Station

South Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Chandu Saidappa Talawar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

13-03-2026

Disposed

16-02-2026

Order on Exh

01-12-2025

Appearance

12-09-2025

Appearance

23-07-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary - S.C.C. No. 652/2024 The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against Chandu Saidappa Talawar for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (involving 20 liters of illicit liquor). Despite multiple summons issued since the charge sheet was filed on 01.08.2024, the accused remained absent and the prosecution failed to secure his presence. Finding continued pendency constituted abuse of process, the court invoked Section 258 of Cr.P.C. to stop proceedings and dispose of the case, canceling the accused's P.R. bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - S.C.C. No. 652/2024 The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against Chandu Saidappa Talawar for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (involving 20 liters of illicit liquor). Despite multiple summons issued since the charge sheet was filed on 01.08.2024, the accused remained absent and the prosecution failed to secure his presence. Finding continued pendency constituted abuse of process, the court invoked Section 258 of Cr.P.C. to stop proceedings and dispose of the case, canceling the accused's P.R. bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case