The State of Maharashtra vs Saipan Babu Jamadar — 651/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150012352024
Filing Number
994/2024
Filing Date
02-Aug-2024
Registration No
651/2024
Registration Date
02-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
281
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Saipan Babu Jamadar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Saipan Babu Jamadar, charged under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, after the prosecution repeatedly failed to secure his presence despite multiple summons over more than one year. The court found that continuing proceedings would constitute an abuse of process, and noted that police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), making further prosecution untenable. The case was disposed of under Section 258 Cr.P.C., and the accused's P.R. bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
23-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
14-Nov-2025
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
11-Sep-2025
B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
15-Jul-2025
Order on Exh
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
25-Apr-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
29-Jan-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
25-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 651/2024
The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Saipan Babu Jamadar, charged under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, after the prosecution repeatedly failed to secure his presence despite multiple summons over more than one year. The court found that continuing proceedings would constitute an abuse of process, and noted that police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), making further prosecution untenable. The case was disposed of under Section 258 Cr.P.C., and the accused's P.R. bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts