Shantappa Siddanna Patil vs Sanganna Nageshi Patil Advocate - Boralkar S.A. — 102/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO150011942024
e-Filing Number
16-07-2024
Filing Number
245/2024
Filing Date
26-Jul-2024
Registration No
102/2024
Registration Date
26-Jul-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shantappa Siddanna Patil
Adv. Shahabade Mallinath Gurubasappa
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanganna Nageshi Patil Advocate - Boralkar S.A.
-
2.Sugalabai Sanganna Patil
-
3.Santosh Sanganna Patil
-
4.Savita Santosh Patil
-
5.Mahadev Nageshi Patil
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
14-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Shantappa Siddanna Patil v. Sanganna Nageshi Patil & Others (R.C.S. 102/2024) The plaintiff's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to conduct measurements of partitioned property (Gat No.326) was rejected with costs. The court held that a Court Commissioner cannot be appointed to collect evidence for parties or ascertain their possession of property portions. The plaintiff must prove his own possession through evidence at trial, and the court may only appoint a Commissioner suo moto after evidence is adduced, if clarification becomes necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
05-Aug-2025
Order
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
01-Aug-2025
Order on Exh
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
28-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
14-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
11-Jun-2025
List of Witness
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
01-Apr-2025
Issues
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
21-Feb-2025
Issues
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
10-Jan-2025
Issues
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
05-Dec-2024
Issues
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
05-Nov-2024
Issues
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
26-Sep-2024
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
26-Sep-2024
Issues
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
25-Sep-2024
Order
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
21-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
19-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
13-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
29-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
23-Aug-2024
Order on Exh
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
13-Aug-2024
Notice_Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
03-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2024
Case Summary: Shantappa Siddanna Patil v. Sanganna Nageshi Patil & Others (R.C.S. 102/2024) The plaintiff's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to conduct measurements of partitioned property (Gat No.326) was rejected with costs. The court held that a Court Commissioner cannot be appointed to collect evidence for parties or ascertain their possession of property portions. The plaintiff must prove his own possession through evidence at trial, and the court may only appoint a Commissioner suo moto after evidence is adduced, if clarification becomes necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts