The State of Maharashtra vs Mina Vasant Gaikwad — 559/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150011112024

Filing Number

884/2024

Filing Date

05-Jul-2024

Registration No

559/2024

Registration Date

05-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mina Vasant Gaikwad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against Mina Vasant Gaikwad under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 CrPC. The court found that despite multiple summons over more than a year, the accused remained absent; police had destroyed seized evidence; and continuing the case would constitute abuse of process. The accused's PR bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  4. 30-Dec-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  5. 16-Sep-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  6. 18-Jun-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  7. 01-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  8. 31-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  9. 26-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  10. 30-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 05-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 559/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate dismissed proceedings against Mina Vasant Gaikwad under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 CrPC. The court found that despite multiple summons over more than a year, the accused remained absent; police had destroyed seized evidence; and continuing the case would constitute abuse of process. The accused's PR bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case