The State of Maharashtra vs Mansurkhan Khadarkha Pathan — 529/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150010702024
Filing Number
848/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
529/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
194
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Mansurkhan Khadarkha Pathan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-01-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 23-09-2025 | Notice_Unready |
| 23-06-2025 | Notice_Unready |
| 21-03-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Mansurkhan Khadarkha Pathan (529/2024) The court dismissed the case against the accused for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS). The Judicial Magistrate found that despite multiple summons issued over more than a year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, and police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), rendering continued proceedings an abuse of process. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and the case was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Mansurkhan Khadarkha Pathan (529/2024) The court dismissed the case against the accused for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS). The Judicial Magistrate found that despite multiple summons issued over more than a year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, and police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), rendering continued proceedings an abuse of process. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and the case was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts