The State of Maharashtra vs Mansurkhan Khadarkha Pathan — 529/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150010702024

Case disposed

Filing Number

848/2024

Filing Date

03-07-2024

Registration No

529/2024

Registration Date

03-07-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

194

Police Station

South Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Mansurkhan Khadarkha Pathan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

13-03-2026

Disposed

07-01-2026

Notice_Unready

23-09-2025

Notice_Unready

23-06-2025

Notice_Unready

21-03-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State v. Mansurkhan Khadarkha Pathan (529/2024) The court dismissed the case against the accused for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS). The Judicial Magistrate found that despite multiple summons issued over more than a year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, and police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), rendering continued proceedings an abuse of process. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and the case was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Mansurkhan Khadarkha Pathan (529/2024) The court dismissed the case against the accused for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 of CrPC (Section 281 BNSS). The Judicial Magistrate found that despite multiple summons issued over more than a year, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, and police had destroyed the seized evidence (muddemal), rendering continued proceedings an abuse of process. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and the case was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case