The State of Maharashtra vs Bandu Laxman Patil — 482/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150009992024
Filing Number
780/2024
Filing Date
26-06-2024
Registration No
482/2024
Registration Date
26-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
North Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Bandu Laxman Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-01-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 23-09-2025 | Notice_Unready |
| 26-06-2025 | Notice_Unready |
| 02-04-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the case against accused Bandu Laxman Patil under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S.), due to the accused's persistent absence despite multiple summons over more than one year. The court held that continuing to keep the case pending would constitute an abuse of process of law. Seized illicit liquor and materials were ordered to be disposed of per law after the appeal period expired, and the accused's P.R. bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the case against accused Bandu Laxman Patil under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S.), due to the accused's persistent absence despite multiple summons over more than one year. The court held that continuing to keep the case pending would constitute an abuse of process of law. Seized illicit liquor and materials were ordered to be disposed of per law after the appeal period expired, and the accused's P.R. bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts