The State of Maharashtra vs Vandana Ashok Gaikwad — 461/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO150009692024

Filing Number

752/2024

Filing Date

25-Jun-2024

Registration No

461/2024

Registration Date

25-Jun-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

Excise

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vandana Ashok Gaikwad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed proceedings against Vandana Ashok Gaikwad under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that multiple summons failed to secure the accused's presence over more than one year, constituting abuse of process. The dismissal was further justified by police destruction of seized evidence (muddemal), making prosecution impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  6. 12-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  7. 22-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  8. 19-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  9. 30-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  10. 25-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.

  11. 26-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 25-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 461/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed proceedings against Vandana Ashok Gaikwad under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that multiple summons failed to secure the accused's presence over more than one year, constituting abuse of process. The dismissal was further justified by police destruction of seized evidence (muddemal), making prosecution impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case