The State of Maharashtra vs Sidhappa Kalappa Talwar — 434/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150009122024
Filing Number
705/2024
Filing Date
15-06-2024
Registration No
434/2024
Registration Date
15-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
187
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Sidhappa Kalappa Talwar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-12-2025 | Unready Board |
| 30-09-2025 | Unready Board |
| 03-07-2025 | Unready Board |
| 25-04-2025 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Sidhappa Kalappa Talwar (434/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Sidhappa Talwar for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (illicit liquor possession) after the accused repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple summons over more than a year. The court found that continuing to keep the case pending would constitute an abuse of process and therefore stopped proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC, canceling the accused's bail bonds and ordering disposal of seized materials (35 liters of illicit liquor and one plastic can) after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Sidhappa Kalappa Talwar (434/2024) The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Sidhappa Talwar for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (illicit liquor possession) after the accused repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple summons over more than a year. The court found that continuing to keep the case pending would constitute an abuse of process and therefore stopped proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC, canceling the accused's bail bonds and ordering disposal of seized materials (35 liters of illicit liquor and one plastic can) after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts