Satlingappa Babu Paramshetti vs Shrimant Gurushant Paramshetti Advocate - Birajdar Iranna Prakash — 36/2023
Case under Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO150008992023
Filing Number
141/2023
Filing Date
26-Apr-2023
Registration No
36/2023
Registration Date
26-Apr-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satlingappa Babu Paramshetti
Adv. Mulla Y. M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shrimant Gurushant Paramshetti Advocate - Birajdar Iranna Prakash
-
2.Shrimant Gurushant Paramshetti
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
02-Sep-2024
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
12-Jan-2024
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
15-Dec-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S. No. 36/2023 The Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction on 15.12.2023. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case of ownership and peaceful possession of two plots through registered sale-deeds (1991 and 1992) and revenue records. The defendant's claim that he purchased the plots on their behalf lacked documentary support. The court restrained the defendant and anyone claiming through him from obstructing the plaintiffs' possession of the plots until final suit disposal, finding balance of convenience favored plaintiffs and they would suffer irreparable loss without the injunction. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Dec-2023
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
01-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
24-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
09-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
03-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
20-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
06-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
21-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
15-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
01-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
25-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
19-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
11-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
26-Jul-2023
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
30-Jun-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
23-Jun-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
09-Jun-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
28-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2023
CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S. No. 36/2023 The Civil Judge allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction on 15.12.2023. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case of ownership and peaceful possession of two plots through registered sale-deeds (1991 and 1992) and revenue records. The defendant's claim that he purchased the plots on their behalf lacked documentary support. The court restrained the defendant and anyone claiming through him from obstructing the plaintiffs' possession of the plots until final suit disposal, finding balance of convenience favored plaintiffs and they would suffer irreparable loss without the injunction. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts