State Bank of India Akkalkot Branch vs Rahul Bharat Aland Advocate - Udachan Siddharam mallikarjun — 35/2025
Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO150007312025
e-Filing Number
15-03-2025
Filing Number
89/2025
Filing Date
18-Mar-2025
Registration No
35/2025
Registration Date
18-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Bank of India Akkalkot Branch
Adv. ADV N M KSHIRSAGAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rahul Bharat Aland Advocate - Udachan Siddharam mallikarjun
-
2.Vaishali Rahul Aland
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Lok-Adalat at Solapur resolved the dispute between State Bank of India Akkalkot Branch and Rahul Bharat Aland through compromise settlement. The respondent paid Rs. 1,50,000 to the bank, and both parties mutually settled their disputes. The suit is withdrawn as compounded and settled, with court fees refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
13-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
02-Jan-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
21-Nov-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
26-Sep-2025
No Say Order
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
08-Aug-2025
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
30-Jun-2025
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
29-Apr-2025
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
27-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2025
The Lok-Adalat at Solapur resolved the dispute between State Bank of India Akkalkot Branch and Rahul Bharat Aland through compromise settlement. The respondent paid Rs. 1,50,000 to the bank, and both parties mutually settled their disputes. The suit is withdrawn as compounded and settled, with court fees refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts