Chandrakant Laxman Rathod vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO150004502026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

418/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

347

Police Station

Valsang Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Chandrakant Laxman Rathod

Adv. Mangrule A.S.

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

09-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

01-04-2026

Compliance

30-03-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application by Chandrakant Laxman Rathod seeking return of a 15-gram gold necklace (worth Rs. 35,000) seized during theft investigation (Crime No. 347/2021). The court held that Section 457 CrPC grants criminal courts jurisdiction to release seized property during investigation stage when rightfully owned, and that acceptance of a summary report does not divest the magistrate's authority over seized property disposal. The gold ornament was released to the applicant upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with conditions prohibiting alteration or alienation of the ornament. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application by Chandrakant Laxman Rathod seeking return of a 15-gram gold necklace (worth Rs. 35,000) seized during theft investigation (Crime No. 347/2021). The court held that Section 457 CrPC grants criminal courts jurisdiction to release seized property during investigation stage when rightfully owned, and that acceptance of a summary report does not divest the magistrate's authority over seized property disposal. The gold ornament was released to the applicant upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with conditions prohibiting alteration or alienation of the ornament. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case