Chandrakant Laxman Rathod vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App — 55/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO150004502026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
418/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
347
Police Station
Valsang Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrakant Laxman Rathod
Adv. Mangrule A.S.
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 01-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 30-03-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed the application by Chandrakant Laxman Rathod seeking return of a 15-gram gold necklace (worth Rs. 35,000) seized during theft investigation (Crime No. 347/2021). The court held that Section 457 CrPC grants criminal courts jurisdiction to release seized property during investigation stage when rightfully owned, and that acceptance of a summary report does not divest the magistrate's authority over seized property disposal. The gold ornament was released to the applicant upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with conditions prohibiting alteration or alienation of the ornament. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the application by Chandrakant Laxman Rathod seeking return of a 15-gram gold necklace (worth Rs. 35,000) seized during theft investigation (Crime No. 347/2021). The court held that Section 457 CrPC grants criminal courts jurisdiction to release seized property during investigation stage when rightfully owned, and that acceptance of a summary report does not divest the magistrate's authority over seized property disposal. The gold ornament was released to the applicant upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with conditions prohibiting alteration or alienation of the ornament. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts