Siddaram Narayan Koli vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App — 54/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO150004492026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
417/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Valsang Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddaram Narayan Koli
Adv. MUSTAK MADAR MANURE
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 20-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 18-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Siddaram Narayan Koli v. State of Maharashtra (54/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition for return of his seized Ashok Leyland Tempo vehicle, finding him to be the registered owner and a fit person for interim custody. The vehicle was seized in connection with unauthorized animal transportation charges. The court released the vehicle subject to strict conditions: execution of a ₹30 lakh indemnity bond, payment of ₹200 per day per animal to Shri Krishna Gaushala for animal care, and prohibitions on altering the vehicle's features or alienating it until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Siddaram Narayan Koli v. State of Maharashtra (54/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition for return of his seized Ashok Leyland Tempo vehicle, finding him to be the registered owner and a fit person for interim custody. The vehicle was seized in connection with unauthorized animal transportation charges. The court released the vehicle subject to strict conditions: execution of a ₹30 lakh indemnity bond, payment of ₹200 per day per animal to Shri Krishna Gaushala for animal care, and prohibitions on altering the vehicle's features or alienating it until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts