Sanjana Anil Mahindrakar vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App — 52/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO150004352026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
405/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
52/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
Akkalkot North Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjana Anil Mahindrakar
Adv. UDACHAN SIDHARAM MALLIKARJUN
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 04-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.M.A.No.52/2026 - Sanjana Anil Mahindrakar vs. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's plea to release Rs.64,899 that was frozen in bank accounts following an online investment scam. The applicant was defrauded by "Bullish Advisory" and a person named Chaitra Rao who lured her into depositing money for a D-mat account and stock market investment, then disappeared. The court found her to be a legitimate fraud victim and ordered the Cyber Cell to transfer the frozen amount back to her account, subject to conditions including furnishing surety, executing an indemnity bond, and maintaining active contact with the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.M.A.No.52/2026 - Sanjana Anil Mahindrakar vs. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's plea to release Rs.64,899 that was frozen in bank accounts following an online investment scam. The applicant was defrauded by "Bullish Advisory" and a person named Chaitra Rao who lured her into depositing money for a D-mat account and stock market investment, then disappeared. The court found her to be a legitimate fraud victim and ordered the Cyber Cell to transfer the frozen amount back to her account, subject to conditions including furnishing surety, executing an indemnity bond, and maintaining active contact with the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts