Suresh Naganna Kumbhar vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App — 43/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO150003882026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
366/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
Akkalkot South Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Naganna Kumbhar
Adv. Hardikar Vijay Ashok
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-03-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected farmer Suresh Kumbhar's application for release of two seized bullocks, finding evidence of animal cruelty during transportation—the animals were tied with ropes restricting movement, without food, water, or veterinary certificates. The court held that possession of a purchase receipt cannot override animal welfare protections and ordered the applicant to pay Rs. 200 per animal daily to the Ahinsa Goshala for ongoing care, with all expenses recoverable from him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected farmer Suresh Kumbhar's application for release of two seized bullocks, finding evidence of animal cruelty during transportation—the animals were tied with ropes restricting movement, without food, water, or veterinary certificates. The court held that possession of a purchase receipt cannot override animal welfare protections and ordered the applicant to pay Rs. 200 per animal daily to the Ahinsa Goshala for ongoing care, with all expenses recoverable from him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts