Satish Vyankatayya Tirandas vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App — 30/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO150003542026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

333/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

Valsang Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Satish Vyankatayya Tirandas

Adv. Kuber Mrunal Chandrakant

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Arguments

23-02-2026

First Order

13-02-2026

First Order

09-02-2026

First Order

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed petitioner Satish Vyankatayya Tirandas's petition challenging a defective two-wheeler (Hero Motocorp HF Delux, registration MH-13/CM-0386) purchased from respondent. The court directed the respondent to refund the purchase price or replace the vehicle, and ordered payment of an indemnity bond of ₹9,50,000. The court found the vehicle defective and unfit for use, upholding the petitioner's consumer grievance claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed petitioner Satish Vyankatayya Tirandas's petition challenging a defective two-wheeler (Hero Motocorp HF Delux, registration MH-13/CM-0386) purchased from respondent. The court directed the respondent to refund the purchase price or replace the vehicle, and ordered payment of an indemnity bond of ₹9,50,000. The court found the vehicle defective and unfit for use, upholding the petitioner's consumer grievance claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case