Satish Vyankatayya Tirandas vs The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App — 30/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO150003542026
e-Filing Number
05-02-2026
Filing Number
333/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
30/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
1-Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
Valsang Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satish Vyankatayya Tirandas
Adv. Kuber Mrunal Chandrakant
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Advocate - App (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed petitioner Satish Vyankatayya Tirandas's petition challenging a defective two-wheeler (Hero Motocorp HF Delux, registration MH-13/CM-0386) purchased from respondent. The court directed the respondent to refund the purchase price or replace the vehicle, and ordered payment of an indemnity bond of ₹9,50,000. The court found the vehicle defective and unfit for use, upholding the petitioner's consumer grievance claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
23-Feb-2026
First Order
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
13-Feb-2026
First Order
Jt. C.J.J.D. and JMFC, Akkalkot
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2026
The court allowed petitioner Satish Vyankatayya Tirandas's petition challenging a defective two-wheeler (Hero Motocorp HF Delux, registration MH-13/CM-0386) purchased from respondent. The court directed the respondent to refund the purchase price or replace the vehicle, and ordered payment of an indemnity bond of ₹9,50,000. The court found the vehicle defective and unfit for use, upholding the petitioner's consumer grievance claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts