The State of Maharashtra vs Shantmal Shivanna Kanni — 126/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO150002452024
Filing Number
203/2024
Filing Date
14-Feb-2024
Registration No
126/2024
Registration Date
15-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
519
Police Station
South Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shantmal Shivanna Kanni
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against accused Shantmal Kanni under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S.), after the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over more than one year, finding continued proceedings would constitute abuse of process. The court cancelled the accused's P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of seized 96 pouches of whiskey according to law after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
19-Dec-2025
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
30-Sep-2025
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
01-Jul-2025
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
26-Mar-2025
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
20-Dec-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
20-Sep-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC Akkalkot.
-
19-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2024
The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against accused Shantmal Kanni under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 Cr.P.C. (Section 281 B.N.S.S.), after the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons over more than one year, finding continued proceedings would constitute abuse of process. The court cancelled the accused's P.R. bonds and ordered disposal of seized 96 pouches of whiskey according to law after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts