Shivlingappa Parmeshwar Patil vs Gram Vikas Adhikari Advocate - Boralkar S.A. — 11/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO150002302025

Evidence

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

14-01-2025

Filing Number

14/2025

Filing Date

17-01-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

17-01-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot

Judge

2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order39

Petitioner(s)

Shivlingappa Parmeshwar Patil

Adv. MULLA YAKUB MASHAK

Respondent(s)

Gram Vikas Adhikari Advocate - Boralkar S.A.

Sharadabai Ishtlingappa Rotte

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.

17-04-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

List of Witness

03-02-2026

Issues

02-01-2026

Issues

12-12-2025

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

14-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case 11/2025 Summary Shivlingappa Parmeshwar Patil v. Gram Vikas Adhikari Advocate - Boralkar S.A. and Sharadabai Ishtlingappa Rotte The court allowed defendants' application to file a written statement beyond the prescribed time limit, despite inordinate delay. The court prioritized deciding the suit on merits over technical grounds, finding that denying the written statement would result in injustice. Defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 as costs to the plaintiff as a condition precedent before their written statement could be admitted on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 11/2025 Summary Shivlingappa Parmeshwar Patil v. Gram Vikas Adhikari Advocate - Boralkar S.A. and Sharadabai Ishtlingappa Rotte The court allowed defendants' application to file a written statement beyond the prescribed time limit, despite inordinate delay. The court prioritized deciding the suit on merits over technical grounds, finding that denying the written statement would result in injustice. Defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 as costs to the plaintiff as a condition precedent before their written statement could be admitted on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case