Shivlingappa Parmeshwar Patil vs Gram Vikas Adhikari Advocate - Boralkar S.A. — 11/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO150002302025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
14-01-2025
Filing Number
14/2025
Filing Date
17-01-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
17-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivlingappa Parmeshwar Patil
Adv. MULLA YAKUB MASHAK
Respondent(s)
Gram Vikas Adhikari Advocate - Boralkar S.A.
Sharadabai Ishtlingappa Rotte
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Evidence
List of Witness
Issues
Issues
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | List of Witness |
| 03-02-2026 | Issues |
| 02-01-2026 | Issues |
| 12-12-2025 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Case 11/2025 Summary Shivlingappa Parmeshwar Patil v. Gram Vikas Adhikari Advocate - Boralkar S.A. and Sharadabai Ishtlingappa Rotte The court allowed defendants' application to file a written statement beyond the prescribed time limit, despite inordinate delay. The court prioritized deciding the suit on merits over technical grounds, finding that denying the written statement would result in injustice. Defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 as costs to the plaintiff as a condition precedent before their written statement could be admitted on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 11/2025 Summary Shivlingappa Parmeshwar Patil v. Gram Vikas Adhikari Advocate - Boralkar S.A. and Sharadabai Ishtlingappa Rotte The court allowed defendants' application to file a written statement beyond the prescribed time limit, despite inordinate delay. The court prioritized deciding the suit on merits over technical grounds, finding that denying the written statement would result in injustice. Defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 as costs to the plaintiff as a condition precedent before their written statement could be admitted on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts