Kamalabai Maruti Desai vs Appana Maruti Desai Advocate - Patil Vishwanath Basavaraj — 4/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO150001482023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2023
Filing Number
45/2023
Filing Date
16-01-2023
Registration No
4/2023
Registration Date
16-01-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Akkalkot
Judge
2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamalabai Maruti Desai
Adv. Sunil Arjunrao Boralkar
Vishwanath Maruti Desai
Adv. Sunil Arjunrao Boralkar
Laxmi Vishwanath Desai
Adv. Sunil Arjunrao Boralkar
Subhash Maruti Desai
Adv. Sunil Arjunrao Boralkar
Respondent(s)
Appana Maruti Desai Advocate - Patil Vishwanath Basavaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJJD and JMFC Akkalkot.
List of Witness
List of Witness
Issues
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | List of Witness |
| 13-03-2026 | List of Witness |
| 10-02-2026 | Issues |
| 09-02-2026 | Order |
| 04-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S No. 4/2023 - Kamalabai vs. Appana Maruti Desai Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED with costs. The court allowed the plaintiffs' application restraining defendants from interfering with their possession of agricultural properties in Akkalkot, finding: (1) plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on partition of joint family property evidenced by mutation entries from 2002; (2) irreparable loss would result without protection; and (3) balance of convenience favored plaintiffs. Defendants were directed not to obstruct plaintiffs' possession pending suit conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S No. 4/2023 - Kamalabai vs. Appana Maruti Desai Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED with costs. The court allowed the plaintiffs' application restraining defendants from interfering with their possession of agricultural properties in Akkalkot, finding: (1) plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on partition of joint family property evidenced by mutation entries from 2002; (2) irreparable loss would result without protection; and (3) balance of convenience favored plaintiffs. Defendants were directed not to obstruct plaintiffs' possession pending suit conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts