The State of Maharashtra vs Ibrahim Rajahamad Shaikh Advocate - Shaikh Ayesha Ismail — 544/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 384. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO140026932023

Filing Number

2645/2023

Filing Date

06-Oct-2023

Registration No

544/2023

Registration Date

06-Oct-2023

Court

Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi

Judge

1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

384

Police Station

Barshi City Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 384

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ibrahim Rajahamad Shaikh Advocate - Shaikh Ayesha Ismail

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case 544/2023 Court Decision: The accused, Ibrahim Rajahamad Shaikh, was acquitted under Indian Penal Code Section 384 (extortion). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on available evidence and witness testimonies. Key Reasoning: The complainant alleged the accused extorted ₹5,000 initially and demanded ₹10,000 more by threatening to publish bakery photos and close the business. However, after examining all eight prosecution witnesses (including the complainant, panch witnesses, and investigating officer), the court noted inconsistencies, a settlement between parties (evidenced by a compromise document), and insufficient corroborating evidence to prove extortion conclusively. The court found the charges were not substantiated by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  10. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  11. 26-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  13. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  14. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  15. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  16. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  17. 29-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  19. 28-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  20. 11-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  21. 29-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  22. 25-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  23. 17-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  24. 19-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  25. 18-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  26. 29-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  27. 15-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  28. 01-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  29. 18-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 06-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 544/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 544/2023 Court Decision: The accused, Ibrahim Rajahamad Shaikh, was acquitted under Indian Penal Code Section 384 (extortion). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on available evidence and witness testimonies. Key Reasoning: The complainant alleged the accused extorted ₹5,000 initially and demanded ₹10,000 more by threatening to publish bakery photos and close the business. However, after examining all eight prosecution witnesses (including the complainant, panch witnesses, and investigating officer), the court noted inconsistencies, a settlement between parties (evidenced by a compromise document), and insufficient corroborating evidence to prove extortion conclusively. The court found the charges were not substantiated by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case