Shriram Transport Fin. Co. vs Anwar Mustafa Sayyad — 799/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,409,420,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO140026452019
Filing Number
2630/2019
Filing Date
16-12-2019
Registration No
799/2019
Registration Date
16-12-2019
Court
Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi
Judge
1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram Transport Fin. Co.
Adv. Mukane Yogesh Mahadeo
Respondent(s)
Anwar Mustafa Sayyad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 31-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 24-11-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 26-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.M.A 799/2019 – Shriram Transport Finance Co. v. Anwar Mustafa Sayyad The Judicial Magistrate disposed of the criminal case under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the complainant's repeated absence and failure to prosecute despite multiple opportunities. The court found that continuing the proceedings served no purpose as the complainant had taken no meaningful steps to advance the complaint, which involved allegations under Sections 406, 409, 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.M.A 799/2019 – Shriram Transport Finance Co. v. Anwar Mustafa Sayyad The Judicial Magistrate disposed of the criminal case under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the complainant's repeated absence and failure to prosecute despite multiple opportunities. The court found that continuing the proceedings served no purpose as the complainant had taken no meaningful steps to advance the complaint, which involved allegations under Sections 406, 409, 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts