The State of Maharashtra vs Nilesh Guruling Kapase — 1200/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO140019452024
Filing Number
1875/2024
Filing Date
19-08-2024
Registration No
1200/2024
Registration Date
20-08-2024
Court
Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi
Judge
1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
478
Police Station
Barshi City Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Nilesh Guruling Kapase
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 28-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Nilesh Guruling Kapase (1200/2024) The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 258 CrPC for violation of Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding critical investigative procedural failures rendered the case indefensible. The court noted the accused had been absent for extended periods without successful prosecution efforts, the panchnama lacked proper body search procedures, and no chemical analyzer report was filed despite seized contraband (Rs. 420). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Nilesh Guruling Kapase (1200/2024) The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 258 CrPC for violation of Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding critical investigative procedural failures rendered the case indefensible. The court noted the accused had been absent for extended periods without successful prosecution efforts, the panchnama lacked proper body search procedures, and no chemical analyzer report was filed despite seized contraband (Rs. 420). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts