The State of Maharashtra vs Laxmibai Gajendra Kale — 722/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO140016422020
Filing Number
1642/2020
Filing Date
06-11-2020
Registration No
722/2020
Registration Date
07-11-2020
Court
Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi
Judge
1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
634
Police Station
Barshi City Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Laxmibai Gajendra Kale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Case 722/2020 The State of Maharashtra v. Laxmibai Gajendra Kale The court acquitted the defendant Laxmibai Gajendra Kale of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Though police seized 15 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹450 from her possession on August 27, 2020, the court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the case conclusively, as key chemical analysis reports were absent from the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 722/2020 The State of Maharashtra v. Laxmibai Gajendra Kale The court acquitted the defendant Laxmibai Gajendra Kale of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Though police seized 15 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹450 from her possession on August 27, 2020, the court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the case conclusively, as key chemical analysis reports were absent from the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts