Seema Jadhavar etc vs Sachin Jadhavar etc Advocate - Inamdar V.B. — 322/2018
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 9(b),32(3). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO140010062018
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1007/2018
Filing Date
20-06-2018
Registration No
322/2018
Registration Date
20-06-2018
Court
Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi
Judge
1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seema Jadhavar etc
Adv. Thokade Anand Vilas
Adhitya Jadhavar
Adv. Thokade Anand Vilas
Vimal Jadhavar
Adv. Thokade Anand Vilas
Respondent(s)
Sachin Jadhavar etc Advocate - Inamdar V.B.
Laxman Jadhavar
Adv. Inamdar V.B.
Vimal Jadhvar
Adv. Jadhavar Shivaji Ramchandrarao
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 322/2018 Court: 2nd Joint Civil Judge & JMFC Court, Barshi Date: 24.09.2019 Outcome: Petition PARTIALLY ALLOWED The court granted the petitioner's application for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondent (Sachin Jadhavar/Respondent 1) was ordered to pay ₹7,500 per month as interim financial support to the petitioner for food, clothing, education, and household expenses. The court found evidence of the petitioner's financial hardship and the respondent's earning capacity (₹28,000 monthly), while rejecting the respondent's contentions that the petition was frivolous and baseless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 322/2018 Court: 2nd Joint Civil Judge & JMFC Court, Barshi Date: 24.09.2019 Outcome: Petition PARTIALLY ALLOWED The court granted the petitioner's application for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondent (Sachin Jadhavar/Respondent 1) was ordered to pay ₹7,500 per month as interim financial support to the petitioner for food, clothing, education, and household expenses. The court found evidence of the petitioner's financial hardship and the respondent's earning capacity (₹28,000 monthly), while rejecting the respondent's contentions that the petition was frivolous and baseless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts