State vs Satish Shinde Etc.4 Advocate - Gund Sahadev Mahadev — 1400206/2010
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 45235432350434. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO140007912010
Filing Number
1400206/2010
Filing Date
04-03-2010
Registration No
1400206/2010
Registration Date
04-03-2010
Court
Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi
Judge
1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
Vairag Police Station
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Tamboli Asif G.
Respondent(s)
Satish Shinde Etc.4 Advocate - Gund Sahadev Mahadev
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 206/2010 Court Decision: All four accused (Satish Kalu Shinde, Shantabai Satish Shinde, Shivaji Satish Shinde, and Uttam Kalu Shinde) were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 504 (with section 34) on March 17, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant and witnesses testified about an incident on June 8, 2009 involving trespassing, harassment, and assault, they later settled the dispute. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimony was weak—occurring 10 years after the incident with poor recollection of details. Critically, the settlement between complainant and accused (evidenced by compromise petition) undermined the prosecution's case, casting doubt on the credibility of accusations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 206/2010 Court Decision: All four accused (Satish Kalu Shinde, Shantabai Satish Shinde, Shivaji Satish Shinde, and Uttam Kalu Shinde) were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 504 (with section 34) on March 17, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant and witnesses testified about an incident on June 8, 2009 involving trespassing, harassment, and assault, they later settled the dispute. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimony was weak—occurring 10 years after the incident with poor recollection of details. Critically, the settlement between complainant and accused (evidenced by compromise petition) undermined the prosecution's case, casting doubt on the credibility of accusations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts