Ashini Sagar Maske vs Sagar Ramchandra Maske etc Advocate - Shinde Nitin Gajendra — 141/2019
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO140005442019
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
540/2019
Filing Date
14-03-2019
Registration No
141/2019
Registration Date
14-03-2019
Court
Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi
Judge
1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashini Sagar Maske
Adv. Gonekar Vishal Dilip
Respondent(s)
Sagar Ramchandra Maske etc Advocate - Shinde Nitin Gajendra
Ramchandra Damodar Maske
Vimal Ramchandra Maske
Shekhar Ramchandra Maske
Adv. Shinde Nitin Gajendra
Nisha Shekhar Maske
Adv. Shinde Nitin Gajendra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 141/2019 Ashini Sagar Maske's interim maintenance application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act was partly allowed. The court directed Respondent No. 1 (Sagar Ramchandra Maske) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month to the applicant from the date of filing, rejecting her request for Rs. 10,000. The court found prima facie evidence of a relationship in the nature of marriage based on the child's birth certificate and circumstances, despite the respondent's denial, and held the applicant entitled to maintenance for herself and her deaf child's medical needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 141/2019 Ashini Sagar Maske's interim maintenance application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act was partly allowed. The court directed Respondent No. 1 (Sagar Ramchandra Maske) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month to the applicant from the date of filing, rejecting her request for Rs. 10,000. The court found prima facie evidence of a relationship in the nature of marriage based on the child's birth certificate and circumstances, despite the respondent's denial, and held the applicant entitled to maintenance for herself and her deaf child's medical needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts