The State of Maharashtra vs Maruti Vitthal Wakade Advocate - Jagnade Vandana N — 46/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSO140002952021

Filing Number

295/2021

Filing Date

28-Jan-2021

Registration No

46/2021

Registration Date

29-Jan-2021

Court

Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi

Judge

2-Jt Cjjd JMFC

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

7

Police Station

Pangari Police Station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maruti Vitthal Wakade Advocate - Jagnade Vandana N

  2. 2.Bandu Bharat Wakade

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Vitthal Wakade & Bandu Bharat Wakade (46/2021) The court acquitted both accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 504, 506 read with 34, finding insufficient evidence. Despite prosecution evidence of a scene inspection memo, the injured complainant himself denied the alleged assault occurred, stating he had settled the dispute with the accused. The court noted no credible testimony established the alleged beating with an iron rod and wooden stick, and found the complainant's subsequent reconciliation document decisive in establishing reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  10. 02-Jan-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  11. 30-Dec-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  13. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  16. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  17. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  18. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  19. 16-Oct-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  20. 14-Aug-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  21. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  22. 20-May-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  23. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  24. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  25. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  26. 17-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  27. 17-Aug-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  28. 03-Jul-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  29. 20-Apr-2023

    Charge

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  30. 21-Feb-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  31. 23-Jan-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  32. 07-Dec-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  33. 03-Oct-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  34. 16-Jun-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  35. 18-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  36. 28-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt Cjjd JMFC

  37. 29-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 28-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Vitthal Wakade & Bandu Bharat Wakade (46/2021) The court acquitted both accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 504, 506 read with 34, finding insufficient evidence. Despite prosecution evidence of a scene inspection memo, the injured complainant himself denied the alleged assault occurred, stating he had settled the dispute with the accused. The court noted no credible testimony established the alleged beating with an iron rod and wooden stick, and found the complainant's subsequent reconciliation document decisive in establishing reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case