The State of Maharashtra vs Maruti Vitthal Wakade Advocate - Jagnade Vandana N — 46/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSO140002952021
Filing Number
295/2021
Filing Date
28-01-2021
Registration No
46/2021
Registration Date
29-01-2021
Court
Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi
Judge
2-Jt CJJD JMFC
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Pangari Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Maruti Vitthal Wakade Advocate - Jagnade Vandana N
Bandu Bharat Wakade
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt CJJD JMFC
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 13-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 23-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Vitthal Wakade & Bandu Bharat Wakade (46/2021) The court acquitted both accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 504, 506 read with 34, finding insufficient evidence. Despite prosecution evidence of a scene inspection memo, the injured complainant himself denied the alleged assault occurred, stating he had settled the dispute with the accused. The court noted no credible testimony established the alleged beating with an iron rod and wooden stick, and found the complainant's subsequent reconciliation document decisive in establishing reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Vitthal Wakade & Bandu Bharat Wakade (46/2021) The court acquitted both accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 504, 506 read with 34, finding insufficient evidence. Despite prosecution evidence of a scene inspection memo, the injured complainant himself denied the alleged assault occurred, stating he had settled the dispute with the accused. The court noted no credible testimony established the alleged beating with an iron rod and wooden stick, and found the complainant's subsequent reconciliation document decisive in establishing reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts