Ashadevi Anil Swami vs The State of Maharashtra — 28/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),305. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 04th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSO140001472026
e-Filing Number
24-01-2026
Filing Number
147/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi
Judge
1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
1004
Police Station
Barshi City Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashadevi Anil Swami
Adv. Kamble Suhas Tulshidas
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ashadevi Anil Swami v. The State of Maharashtra (Cri M.A No. 28/2026) The court allowed Ashadevi's application for interim custody of gold ornaments (24-gram Ganthan and 4-gram Bormal) seized by Barshi City Police Station in connection with theft charges under BNS sections 331(3) and 305. The applicant established ownership through purchase receipts and filed the original FIR; the accused raised no counter-claim. The court granted interim custody subject to strict conditions: the applicant must furnish a ₹2,50,000 indemnity bond, cannot sell or alter the ornaments until trial concludes, must bear photographic documentation costs, and must produce the items as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ashadevi Anil Swami v. The State of Maharashtra (Cri M.A No. 28/2026) The court allowed Ashadevi's application for interim custody of gold ornaments (24-gram Ganthan and 4-gram Bormal) seized by Barshi City Police Station in connection with theft charges under BNS sections 331(3) and 305. The applicant established ownership through purchase receipts and filed the original FIR; the accused raised no counter-claim. The court granted interim custody subject to strict conditions: the applicant must furnish a ₹2,50,000 indemnity bond, cannot sell or alter the ornaments until trial concludes, must bear photographic documentation costs, and must produce the items as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts