Ashadevi Anil Swami vs The State of Maharashtra — 28/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),305. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSO140001472026

e-Filing Number

24-01-2026

Filing Number

147/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

Junior Magistrate First Class , Barshi

Judge

1-2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1004

Police Station

Barshi City Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),305
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashadevi Anil Swami

    Adv. Kamble Suhas Tulshidas

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Ashadevi Anil Swami v. The State of Maharashtra (Cri M.A No. 28/2026) The court allowed Ashadevi's application for interim custody of gold ornaments (24-gram Ganthan and 4-gram Bormal) seized by Barshi City Police Station in connection with theft charges under BNS sections 331(3) and 305. The applicant established ownership through purchase receipts and filed the original FIR; the accused raised no counter-claim. The court granted interim custody subject to strict conditions: the applicant must furnish a ₹2,50,000 indemnity bond, cannot sell or alter the ornaments until trial concludes, must bear photographic documentation costs, and must produce the items as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  12. 27-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  15. 20-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  16. 17-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  17. 12-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  18. 09-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  19. 05-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  20. 02-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    2nd Jt.CJJD, Judicial Magistrate F.C. Barshi.

  21. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ashadevi Anil Swami v. The State of Maharashtra (Cri M.A No. 28/2026) The court allowed Ashadevi's application for interim custody of gold ornaments (24-gram Ganthan and 4-gram Bormal) seized by Barshi City Police Station in connection with theft charges under BNS sections 331(3) and 305. The applicant established ownership through purchase receipts and filed the original FIR; the accused raised no counter-claim. The court granted interim custody subject to strict conditions: the applicant must furnish a ₹2,50,000 indemnity bond, cannot sell or alter the ornaments until trial concludes, must bear photographic documentation costs, and must produce the items as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case