Dnyandeo Sonawane. vs Gokul Sonawane. etc.3. Advocate - Sonawane A. C — 1300004/2013
Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130021002012
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
1301401/2012
Filing Date
21-12-2012
Registration No
1300004/2013
Registration Date
02-01-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Petitioner(s)
Dnyandeo Sonawane.
Adv. Shete Sachin Neminath
Dnyandev Gokul Sonawane
Adv. Bhosale S. A.
Respondent(s)
Gokul Sonawane. etc.3. Advocate - Sonawane A. C
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 12-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 19-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 4/2013 Outcome: Application REJECTED Defendant No. 1 sought to reject the plaint in a partition suit under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, arguing the plaintiff had suppressed material facts and was not actually his son. The court rejected this application, holding that whether the plaintiff is defendant No. 1's son is a disputed question of fact that cannot be decided without evidence and trial. The court found the case does not fall under any grounds for plaint rejection under Order VII Rule 11, allowing the suit to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 4/2013 Outcome: Application REJECTED Defendant No. 1 sought to reject the plaint in a partition suit under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, arguing the plaintiff had suppressed material facts and was not actually his son. The court rejected this application, holding that whether the plaintiff is defendant No. 1's son is a disputed question of fact that cannot be decided without evidence and trial. The court found the case does not fall under any grounds for plaint rejection under Order VII Rule 11, allowing the suit to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts