Mahadev Paikekar.etc.1. vs Pandurang Paikekar. etc.1. Advocate - Katmore P. B, Katmore — 1301031/2013
Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130017092013
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Date
01-10-2013
Registration No
1301031/2013
Registration Date
01-10-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Petitioner(s)
Mahadev Paikekar.etc.1.
Adv. Mangire Soham Nitin
Dattatray Paikekar.
Adv. Mundhe Manikrao L.
Respondent(s)
Pandurang Paikekar. etc.1. Advocate - Katmore P. B, Katmore
Jayram Paikekar.
Adv. Katmore P. B
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 30-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 20-12-2025 | Compliance |
| 03-10-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1301031/2013 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to conduct a local inspection of the disputed property (S.S. No. 328, area 20.9 sq.m. in Goudgaon, Barshi) to determine whether the respondent has encroached on the petitioner's land by constructing a wall. The commissioner must examine the boundaries, prepare a detailed report with measurements, and clarify the extent of any encroachment before the next hearing. Both parties must cooperate with the investigation, and the petitioner shall bear the commissioner's fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1301031/2013 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to conduct a local inspection of the disputed property (S.S. No. 328, area 20.9 sq.m. in Goudgaon, Barshi) to determine whether the respondent has encroached on the petitioner's land by constructing a wall. The commissioner must examine the boundaries, prepare a detailed report with measurements, and clarify the extent of any encroachment before the next hearing. Both parties must cooperate with the investigation, and the petitioner shall bear the commissioner's fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts