Bhagwan Jadhav. vs Smt. Gojarbai Deshmukh. etc.3. Advocate - Bugade Ramesh M — 1301026/2013
Case under Ia/1/2019 Classification : Amendment of the Pleadings Section Bhagwan Jadhav.Smt. Gojarbai Deshmukh. etc.3. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130016912013
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Date
30-09-2013
Registration No
1301026/2013
Registration Date
30-09-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagwan Jadhav.
Adv. Vishwarupe Chandrakant P.
Respondent(s)
Smt. Gojarbai Deshmukh. etc.3. Advocate - Bugade Ramesh M
Shivaji Deshmukh.
Adv. Bugade Ramesh M
Dhanaji Deshmukh.
Adv. Bugade Ramesh M
Rajendra Deshmukh.
Adv. Bugade Ramesh M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Bhagwan Jadhav v. Smt. Gojarbai Deshmukh (1301026/2013) Outcome: The respondent's application under Order 53 was granted with costs. The court found that petitioner Bhagwan Jadhav failed to establish prima facie case or concrete evidence of any third-party interest being created in the disputed property, and therefore dismissed concerns regarding imminent irreparable injury to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Bhagwan Jadhav v. Smt. Gojarbai Deshmukh (1301026/2013) Outcome: The respondent's application under Order 53 was granted with costs. The court found that petitioner Bhagwan Jadhav failed to establish prima facie case or concrete evidence of any third-party interest being created in the disputed property, and therefore dismissed concerns regarding imminent irreparable injury to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts