Prabhakar Mali vs Babruwan Kashid Advocate - Khandelwal Sanjay B — 898/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO130010562016

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

1101/2016

Filing Date

29-11-2016

Registration No

898/2016

Registration Date

01-12-2016

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
IA/1/2022 Classification : Permission to file Written Statement after 30 or 90 days Section Babruwan KashidPrabhakar Mali

Petitioner(s)

Prabhakar Mali

Adv. Bhosale S. A.

Utreshwar Mali

Respondent(s)

Babruwan Kashid Advocate - Khandelwal Sanjay B

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

21-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

05-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

07-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

25-04-2022
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary - R.C.S. 898/2016 The defendant's application to set aside the "no written statement" order was allowed. The court permitted the defendant to file his written statement on record, considering his claims of inability to appear due to service constraints, a 2019 accident with brain injury, and COVID-19 restrictions. However, the court imposed cost of Rs. 500 payable to the plaintiff as reasonable compensation for the significant delay in the 6+ year-old declaration and injunction suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - R.C.S. 898/2016 The defendant's application to set aside the "no written statement" order was allowed. The court permitted the defendant to file his written statement on record, considering his claims of inability to appear due to service constraints, a 2019 accident with brain injury, and COVID-19 restrictions. However, the court imposed cost of Rs. 500 payable to the plaintiff as reasonable compensation for the significant delay in the 6+ year-old declaration and injunction suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case