Ranveer Raoso Patil vs Raoso Lalaso Patil — 765/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130009112025
e-Filing Number
18-10-2025
Filing Number
966/2025
Filing Date
28-Oct-2025
Registration No
765/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ranveer Raoso Patil
Adv. PATIL SAMBHAJI SHIVAJIRAO
-
2.Ruhi Raoso Patil
Adv. PATIL SAMBHAJI SHIVAJIRAO
-
3.Pooja Raoso Patil
Adv. PATIL SAMBHAJI SHIVAJIRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raoso Lalaso Patil
-
2.Amol Lalaso Patil
-
3.Pravin Lalaso Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
DecreeView PDF
The National Lok Adalat at Barshi (dated March 14, 2026) resolved the dispute between Ranveer Raoso Patil, Ruhi Raoso Patil, and Pooja Raoso Patil (petitioners) versus Raoso Lalaso Patil, Amol Lalaso Patil, and Pravin Lalaso Patil (respondents) through a settlement agreement. The parties compromised the matter, and the court passed an award based on the agreed settlement terms, with specific land distribution details recorded in tables identifying various land parcels by location, area, and survey numbers. Any court fees paid by either party shall be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
13-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
12-Mar-2026
Compliance
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
11-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
28-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.
-
04-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 765/2025
The National Lok Adalat at Barshi (dated March 14, 2026) resolved the dispute between Ranveer Raoso Patil, Ruhi Raoso Patil, and Pooja Raoso Patil (petitioners) versus Raoso Lalaso Patil, Amol Lalaso Patil, and Pravin Lalaso Patil (respondents) through a settlement agreement. The parties compromised the matter, and the court passed an award based on the agreed settlement terms, with specific land distribution details recorded in tables identifying various land parcels by location, area, and survey numbers. Any court fees paid by either party shall be refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts