Hirabai Khandekar. @ Sou. Hirabai Kale. vs Vasant Khandekar. etc.9. Advocate - Mujawar Sarfaraz M — 1300604/2013
Case under Ia/1/2022 Classification : Commission Request Section Hirabai Khandekar. @ Sou. Hirabai Kale. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130008772013
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1300698/2013
Filing Date
04-05-2013
Registration No
1300604/2013
Registration Date
06-05-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hirabai Khandekar. @ Sou. Hirabai Kale.
Adv. Thokade Anand Vilas
Respondent(s)
Vasant Khandekar. etc.9. Advocate - Mujawar Sarfaraz M
Ramesh Khandekar.
Bansi Zadge.
Kaluram Zadge.
Sagar Zadge.
Akash Zadge.
Sou. Renuka Gite.
Vimal Dhone.
Pashu Pinjari.
Munwar Pinjari.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 17-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 28-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 23-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Hirabai Khandekar v. Vasant Khandekar (1300604/2013) Outcome: The petitioner's application for permission to file a written reply to the respondents' counter-affidavit was ALLOWED. Despite a delay of over nine years in filing the reply, the court granted the petitioner the opportunity to submit a written response, considering the case involved merits and substantive issues. The respondents were ordered to pay court costs of ₹2,000 to the petitioner within seven days, failing which the order would be recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Hirabai Khandekar v. Vasant Khandekar (1300604/2013) Outcome: The petitioner's application for permission to file a written reply to the respondents' counter-affidavit was ALLOWED. Despite a delay of over nine years in filing the reply, the court granted the petitioner the opportunity to submit a written response, considering the case involved merits and substantive issues. The respondents were ordered to pay court costs of ₹2,000 to the petitioner within seven days, failing which the order would be recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts