Suman Ashok Bhol vs Babruddin Daulat Mulani — 698/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130008612022
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
907/2022
Filing Date
21-10-2022
Registration No
698/2022
Registration Date
01-11-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suman Ashok Bhol
Adv. Sakhare P.S.
Respondent(s)
Babruddin Daulat Mulani
Abdul Ajmoddin Mulani
Salim Ajmoddin Mulani
Jilani Ajmoddin Mulani
Hasina Allauddin Mulani
Bashabi Mahammad Mulani
Aslam Mahammad Mulani
Shaukat Mahammad Mulani
Jamila Ansar Shaikh
Javed Babruddin Mulani
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Issues |
| 13-03-2026 | Issues |
| 08-01-2026 | Issues |
| 31-12-2025 | Issues |
| 19-11-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 698/2022 The court partially granted petitioner Suman Ashok Bhol's interim relief petition against respondents Babruddin Daulat Mulani and others. The court found that respondents damaged a boundary wall separating the parties' agricultural lands in Mouje Devgaon, Barshi, Solapur, causing water from respondents' field to flow into petitioner's field and damage his soybean crop. The court ordered respondents 1-4, 6-8, and 10 to cease demolishing the wall, drain water from petitioner's field, and refrain from trespassing, effective until final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 698/2022 The court partially granted petitioner Suman Ashok Bhol's interim relief petition against respondents Babruddin Daulat Mulani and others. The court found that respondents damaged a boundary wall separating the parties' agricultural lands in Mouje Devgaon, Barshi, Solapur, causing water from respondents' field to flow into petitioner's field and damage his soybean crop. The court ordered respondents 1-4, 6-8, and 10 to cease demolishing the wall, drain water from petitioner's field, and refrain from trespassing, effective until final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts