Shital Kakasaheb Gund vs Kakasaheb Nivrutti Gund — 709/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 36. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130008232024
e-Filing Number
19-11-2024
Filing Number
852/2024
Filing Date
22-Nov-2024
Registration No
709/2024
Registration Date
22-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shital Kakasaheb Gund
Adv. GUND SHEETAL KAKASAHEB
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kakasaheb Nivrutti Gund
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
13-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
01-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
28-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
06-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
29-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
29-Aug-2025
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
01-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
12-Jun-2025
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary of Case 709/2024 Court: 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Barshi, Solapur District, Maharashtra Parties: Shital Kakasaheb Gund (Petitioner) v. Kakasaheb Nivrutti Gund & Others (Respondents) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction was DISMISSED. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in her favor, and (3) irreparable harm. While the petitioner claimed shared ancestral agricultural property rights and alleged respondents were attempting unauthorized sale, insufficient documentary evidence was provided. The court noted respondents' names did not appear in official revenue records as co-owners, and the petitioner failed to prove imminent property transfer or establish legal entitlement to the injunction. Date: 12 June 2025 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2025
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Apr-2025
Reply/Say
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
28-Mar-2025
Reply/Say
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
18-Mar-2025
Order on Exh
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
03-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
13-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
20-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
10-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
18-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
02-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
26-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 709/2024
Summary of Case 709/2024 Court: 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Barshi, Solapur District, Maharashtra Parties: Shital Kakasaheb Gund (Petitioner) v. Kakasaheb Nivrutti Gund & Others (Respondents) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction was DISMISSED. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in her favor, and (3) irreparable harm. While the petitioner claimed shared ancestral agricultural property rights and alleged respondents were attempting unauthorized sale, insufficient documentary evidence was provided. The court noted respondents' names did not appear in official revenue records as co-owners, and the petitioner failed to prove imminent property transfer or establish legal entitlement to the injunction. Date: 12 June 2025 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts