Abhimanyu Prahlad Yewale vs Bhishmacharya Babruwan Manjre — 691/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO130008222025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

04th July 2026

e-Filing Number

04-09-2025

Filing Number

869/2025

Filing Date

08-09-2025

Registration No

691/2025

Registration Date

08-09-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Abhimanyu Prahlad Yewale

Adv. JADHAVAR SHIVAJI RAMCHANDRA

Respondent(s)

Bhishmacharya Babruwan Manjre

Kripacharya Babruwan Manjre

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

04-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

09-09-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case 691/2025 Summary: Petitioner Abhimanyu Prahlad Yewale sought urgent interim relief against respondents Bhishmacharya and Kripacharya Manjre for illegally constructing RCC pillars and 4-5 feet high walls on his property's eastern boundary, blocking his eastern passage. The court issued a show-cause notice requiring respondents to explain why an interim order should not be passed against them, while refusing to grant one-sided relief without hearing the respondents. Special bailiff and expedited process were permitted if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 691/2025 Summary: Petitioner Abhimanyu Prahlad Yewale sought urgent interim relief against respondents Bhishmacharya and Kripacharya Manjre for illegally constructing RCC pillars and 4-5 feet high walls on his property's eastern boundary, blocking his eastern passage. The court issued a show-cause notice requiring respondents to explain why an interim order should not be passed against them, while refusing to grant one-sided relief without hearing the respondents. Special bailiff and expedited process were permitted if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case