Mallikarjun Swami. vs Narayan Kakade Advocate - Kshirsagar Kuldip S — 1300506/2014

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO130007032014

Defence Evidence

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

Filing Number

1300583/2014

Filing Date

03-05-2014

Registration No

1300506/2014

Registration Date

05-05-2014

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 36
IA/1/2022 Classification : Commission Request Section Mallikarjun Swami.Narayan Kakade

Petitioner(s)

Mallikarjun Swami.

Adv. Zalte Rahul T

Respondent(s)

Narayan Kakade Advocate - Kshirsagar Kuldip S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Barshi.

24-04-2026

Defence Evidence

04-04-2026

Defence Evidence

20-03-2026

Defence Evidence

13-03-2026

Defence Evidence

07-02-2026

Defence Evidence

Interim Orders

17-10-2015
Order on T.I.
09-11-2022
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 506/2014 (Mallikarjun v/s Narayan Kakade Advocate) Defendant's application to set aside, discharge, or vary a temporary injunction order was rejected. The court found the defendant failed to demonstrate either a change in circumstances or undue hardship as required under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC. The injunction order had been previously upheld by the District Judge on appeal, making a subsequent application without substantial new grounds procedurally improper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 506/2014 (Mallikarjun v/s Narayan Kakade Advocate) Defendant's application to set aside, discharge, or vary a temporary injunction order was rejected. The court found the defendant failed to demonstrate either a change in circumstances or undue hardship as required under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC. The injunction order had been previously upheld by the District Judge on appeal, making a subsequent application without substantial new grounds procedurally improper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case