Balkrushna Shankar Kamble vs Sudhakar Bharat Bhadakwad — 555/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 29th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130006822021
Filing Number
776/2021
Filing Date
12-Oct-2021
Registration No
555/2021
Registration Date
13-Oct-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Balkrushna Shankar Kamble
Adv. Gund Ranajeet N
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sudhakar Bharat Bhadakwad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 555/2021 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioner's application for a permanent injunction against the respondent. The petitioner failed to prove legitimate ownership of the disputed agricultural property and could not substantiate claims that the respondent was unlawfully obstructing his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land. Key Reasoning: Although the petitioner produced a 7/12 land record extract and a sale deed from 2000 suggesting his purchase, he did not adequately prove actual physical possession or exclusive control of the property. The respondent's counter-claim that the property was mortgaged as security for a loan (with the mortgagee maintaining control) remained unrefuted. Without proving lawful possession before seeking the injunction, the petitioner's case for restraining the respondent failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgment
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
24-Apr-2026
Judgment
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgment
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgment
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
04-Apr-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
04-Feb-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
31-Jan-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
01-Jan-2026
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
26-Nov-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
12-Nov-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
03-Nov-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
01-Oct-2025
Arguments
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
24-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
13-Aug-2025
Defence Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
30-Jun-2025
Defence Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
19-Jun-2025
Defence Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
07-May-2025
Defence Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Apr-2025
Defence Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
17-Mar-2025
Defence Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
25-Feb-2025
Defence Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
28-Aug-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
06-May-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
02-Apr-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
05-Mar-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
22-Dec-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
06-Dec-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
01-Nov-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
07-Oct-2023
Evidence
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
21-Aug-2023
List of Witness
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
05-Jul-2023
Issues
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
08-Jun-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
08-Jun-2023
Issues
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
28-Mar-2023
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
14-Feb-2023
Steps
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
19-Jan-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
19-Jan-2023
Steps
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
22-Nov-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
14-Oct-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
13-Sep-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
20-Aug-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
07-Jul-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
09-Jun-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Apr-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
14-Mar-2022
Hearing Without W.S.
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
27-Jan-2022
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
27-Jan-2022
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
25-Jan-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
15-Jan-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
20-Dec-2021
Arguments
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
27-Oct-2021
W.S. and Say
4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
-
16-Oct-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Oct-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 555/2021
Summary of Case 555/2021 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioner's application for a permanent injunction against the respondent. The petitioner failed to prove legitimate ownership of the disputed agricultural property and could not substantiate claims that the respondent was unlawfully obstructing his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land. Key Reasoning: Although the petitioner produced a 7/12 land record extract and a sale deed from 2000 suggesting his purchase, he did not adequately prove actual physical possession or exclusive control of the property. The respondent's counter-claim that the property was mortgaged as security for a loan (with the mortgagee maintaining control) remained unrefuted. Without proving lawful possession before seeking the injunction, the petitioner's case for restraining the respondent failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts