Somnath Thorat vs Uday Dhumal Advocate - Dongare Gayatri A. — 451/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO130005262017
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
739/2017
Filing Date
09-06-2017
Registration No
451/2017
Registration Date
09-06-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Barshi
Judge
5-4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Somnath Thorat
Adv. Patil Sambhaji S
Respondent(s)
Uday Dhumal Advocate - Dongare Gayatri A.
Arjun Dhumal
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and JMFC Barshi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-12-2025 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Somnath Thorat v. Uday Dhumal (Case 451/2017) Outcome: The petitioner's application for temporary injunction under CPC Section 39 was GRANTED. The court ordered that respondents cease obstructing the petitioner's peaceful possession of agricultural land (Plot 260/7) in Turkpimpri, Barshi taluka, Solapur district, and restrained them from further trespass or encroachment on the property. Key Issue: Petitioner claimed ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land containing lemon orchards, alleging respondents attempted unauthorized construction and trespassing on May 20, 2017. The court found petitioner established prima facie possession rights and potential irreparable harm warranting interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Somnath Thorat v. Uday Dhumal (Case 451/2017) Outcome: The petitioner's application for temporary injunction under CPC Section 39 was GRANTED. The court ordered that respondents cease obstructing the petitioner's peaceful possession of agricultural land (Plot 260/7) in Turkpimpri, Barshi taluka, Solapur district, and restrained them from further trespass or encroachment on the property. Key Issue: Petitioner claimed ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land containing lemon orchards, alleging respondents attempted unauthorized construction and trespassing on May 20, 2017. The court found petitioner established prima facie possession rights and potential irreparable harm warranting interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts